Alright, gentlemen and lady. Time to make some predictions and piss some of you off. There's nothing quite like reading an independent vulgar man's take (i.e. Morpheus Randy) on the risky decisions you've made in drafting. It's like criticizing the work of a window-washer perched high above on a dangerous skyscraper; the window washer does all the dangerous work, while those safe inside the building can't get past the fact that he missed some spots on the corner of a pane.
"What an interesting analogy," said Dick Burns.
Admittedly, I type this post as my window washers dangle on the side of Randy Headquarters, ensuring that my ivory tower is pristine and well maintained. What can I say? My tower is huge, it's beautiful and it's the best. Does that sound familiar?
![]() |
| Huge. |
[Position, followed by rank, followed by analysis.]
CENTRE
![]() |
| It's a Safari vs. Burgs showdown. |
1. Safari, Burgs
3. Sitch
4. Dick Burns
5. Tree Bone
"Yeah! Crosbone!" yelled Burgundy.
Yes, yes, Burgundy. You've been ranked number one again this year at centre. And yes, it is in large part due to your Crosbone. With the pick-up of Kuznetsov, Burgundy's centre position is even stronger this year. However, he now shares the ranking with the Silver Lion, who can counter with Seguin and Company (i.e. Giroux, Couture, Johansen, Matthews and Getzlaf). Giroux and Getzlaf, in my opinion, had off years last year, and Seguin in his own right was injured for 10 games. He's also younger than Crosby and did not undergo a deep playoff run in 2016, so methinks he's got what it takes to outscore SC87.
"Let's hope so," said Safari.
LEFT WING
![]() |
| Once again, Safari locks down Alex Ovechkin (LW). |
1. Safari
2. Burgs
3. Dick Burns, Tree Bone
5. Sitch
Generally speaking, LW is the easiest to evaluate because Safari usually stocks up on LW (it's slightly easier for him given he already occupies a Keeper in Ovechkin), making him a top contender. However, this year's evaluation was much tougher. I still give the hat tip to Safari, but there's a significant log jam the rest of the way. I really considered giving the edge to Burgs since he has Benn, but his support cast in Hall and Lucic are questionable in my mind, mostly because there's significant risk that Hall will party hard and ask every girl in NJ for a blow jam. Dick (Pacioretty, Parise, Sedin) and Tree (Panarin, Forsberg, Huberdeau) both have very well-rounded LWs, but do not have any of the 'elites' in the League, in my opinion. Finally, Sitch (Gaudreau, Drouin) has the most interesting of the bunch; Gaudreau has proven that he can play with the best, but Drouin is a calculated risky bet. Drouin was a force during the end of last season, and carried the play well into the playoffs, but he remains unproven. Suffice to say, Sitch is definitely a wildcard.
RIGHT WING
![]() |
| "That's a nice purse!" |
1. Tree Bone
2. Safari
3. Burgs, Sitch, Dick
She's got Pavelski and Kane; need I say more? The only other select-GM who was able to get a bit of consideration was Safari, who boasts Tarasenko and Simmonds; however, it was not nearly enough to overtake Tree Bone's rank.
"This is a no-contest," said Tree Bone.
DEFENSE
![]() |
| Do you see a ThunderZone? |
1. Sitch
2. Dick Burns
3. Tree Bone
4. Safari, Burgs
I think Sitch went into the Draft with a mission this year: be the whore who hoards all the D-men. Burns, Subban, Byfuglien, Klingberg, Seabrook, Keith and Ekblad. Now, admittedly three of them (Byfuglien, Seabrook and Keith) are a bit older and may be past their prime, but all D-men Sitch has assembled would be welcomed on any other roster, so he did a fine job in absolutely demoralizing all other select-GM's in the D department.
"My D department is just fine and dandy, thank you very much," said Dick Burns.
Agreed, Sir Dick, but I was referring to fantasy hockey only. That being said, Dick picked up a few good gems himself; Karlsson (this year's first-overall) leads Team DB, and produces at a rate that most forwards can't even keep up with, so Dick Burns will hopefully be able to keep pace with Sitch.
GOAL
![]() |
| Can it get any better than this? |
1. Safari
2. Burgs
3. Dick Burns
4. Tree Bone
5. Sitch
My rankings may be controversial (hell, they always are), but I'm giving the nod to Safari on this one since he's not only picked two of the elites (Holtby and Rinne), but also because I think the respective teams they play for will have monstrous years. Washington will be a force like in previous years, and the addition of Subban to Nashville will add some wins for Rinne. Rask, the third tender for Safari, is as good as they come; hopefully Boston will recover from a lackluster year.
There was a log jam from 2 to 4, but the biggest wildcard (again) lies with Sitch. His selection of Allen (who may finally get a full year's worth of games now that Elliott has been shipped to Calgary) may prove to be a winner, but St. Louis will be in a tough Western Conference. SJ tender Jones is also coming off a Stanley Cup Final run, so I question whether he will be able to play all season long. And Fleury, a decent tender on an elite Penguin team, may be the odd man out once Murray is healthy.
In summary:
Randy's Stats Machine is projecting a Lion-esque victory. With the exception of a weaker defense than some other select-GM's, Safari seems otherwise well-rounded, and his forwards and goalies will be able to pick up the slack that his d-men leave. Burgs will not be far behind, and Dick and Tree Bone will duke it out in the middle ranks. The biggest fall this year will be Sitch, who, outside of d-men, looks to be short everywhere else.
"He is a short man," said Dick Burns.
Wise words, Dick.















